The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Analysis of spatial and temporal variations of NDVI and its driving factors in the corridor of Lan-Xin railway
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Environmental Science, May 2024
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fenvs.2024.1369974 |
| Authors |
Xingshan Chen, Qingwu Yan, Minghao Yi, Xiaosong Ma, Guie Li, Zihao Wu, Qinke Pan, Yong Qiu |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Lecturer | 1 | 50% |
| Other | 1 | 50% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 January 2024.
All research outputs
#17,903,040
of 26,213,251 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Environmental Science
#1,541
of 4,860 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#131,932
of 261,373 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Environmental Science
#35
of 47 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,213,251 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,860 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 261,373 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 47 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.