The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Practicalities of community-led continuous water quality monitoring: lessons from Taiwan and UK pilots
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Environmental Science, July 2024
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fenvs.2024.1371048 |
| Authors |
Eleanor Starkey, Amy Jones, Susana Ochoa-Rodriguez, Sachit Mahajan, Chi-Ling Wei, Pei-Chun Chen, Shau-Yuan Liu, Li-Pen Wang, Claire L. Walsh |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 43% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 3 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 86% |
| Scientists | 1 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 August 2024.
All research outputs
#6,565,071
of 26,452,360 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Environmental Science
#648
of 4,968 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,654
of 189,923 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Environmental Science
#15
of 116 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,452,360 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,968 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 189,923 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 116 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.