You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Climate change impacts on precipitation and water resources in Northwestern China
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Environmental Science, April 2024
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fenvs.2024.1377286 |
| Authors |
Bohua Zheng, Kui Chen, Bin Li, Yuanyuan Li, Lianmei Shi, Hongyun Fan |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 3 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 67% |
| Other | 1 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 2 | 67% |
| Engineering | 1 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 May 2024.
All research outputs
#3,890,767
of 25,830,657 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Environmental Science
#449
of 4,810 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,833
of 170,185 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Environmental Science
#10
of 62 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,830,657 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,810 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 170,185 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 62 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.