↓ Skip to main content

Spatial characteristics and optimization of urban living space carbon suitability index (ULS-CSI) in Tianjin, China

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Environmental Science, August 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Spatial characteristics and optimization of urban living space carbon suitability index (ULS-CSI) in Tianjin, China
Published in
Frontiers in Environmental Science, August 2024
DOI 10.3389/fenvs.2024.1409624
Authors

Zhaowei Yin, Xiaoping Zhang, Peng Chen, Qinghua Liao

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 September 2024.
All research outputs
#6,984,580
of 26,593,860 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Environmental Science
#724
of 4,990 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,450
of 169,519 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Environmental Science
#17
of 114 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,593,860 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,990 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 169,519 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 114 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.