The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Water filter: a rapid water environmental DNA collector in the field
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Environmental Science, August 2024
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fenvs.2024.1415338 |
| Authors |
Ping Wu, Jie Feng, Mingxia Ju, Shenhao Wu, Weichun Han, Miao Wang, Junquan Liao, Lifeng Zhao, Yifan Gao, Jiao Zheng, Mingjie Luo, Huixian Gong, Lidong Zeng, Juan Lai, Mingze Li, Qin Yan, Lei Sun, Yongfeng Liu |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 6 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 83% |
| Scientists | 1 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 August 2024.
All research outputs
#8,946,506
of 26,563,001 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Environmental Science
#940
of 4,987 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#50,954
of 164,348 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Environmental Science
#20
of 113 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,563,001 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,987 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 164,348 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 113 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.