The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Mapping scholarly publications of energy conservation and emission reduction in support of the sustainable development goals (SDGs)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Environmental Science, July 2024
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fenvs.2024.1421990 |
| Authors |
Kewei Xu, Mingmei Yang, Jiamiao Yang, Butina Nataliia, Yuanyuan Cai, Hao Zhang, Yanwen Wang |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 3 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 2 | 67% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 2 | 67% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 July 2024.
All research outputs
#3,974,122
of 26,243,859 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Environmental Science
#464
of 4,865 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,205
of 149,738 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Environmental Science
#6
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,243,859 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,865 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 149,738 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.