↓ Skip to main content

Quantitative evaluation of uncertainty and interpretability in machine learning-based landslide susceptibility mapping through feature selection and explainable AI

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Environmental Science, July 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (55th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Quantitative evaluation of uncertainty and interpretability in machine learning-based landslide susceptibility mapping through feature selection and explainable AI
Published in
Frontiers in Environmental Science, July 2024
DOI 10.3389/fenvs.2024.1424988
Authors

Xuan-Hien Le, Chanul Choi, Song Eu, Minho Yeon, Giha Lee

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 1 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Lecturer 1 100%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 100%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 August 2024.
All research outputs
#17,338,575
of 26,427,317 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Environmental Science
#1,351
of 4,951 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#67,334
of 153,164 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Environmental Science
#18
of 97 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,427,317 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,951 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 153,164 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 97 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.