The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The effects of grazing and the meteorologic factors on wind-sand flux in the desert steppe
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Environmental Science, August 2024
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fenvs.2024.1428828 |
| Authors |
Biao Meng, Cuiping Gao, Shijie Lv, Guodong Han, Zhiguo Li, Junran Li, Qian Wu, Feng Zhang |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 August 2024.
All research outputs
#21,512,058
of 26,406,115 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Environmental Science
#1,891
of 4,939 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#85,779
of 135,199 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Environmental Science
#25
of 86 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,406,115 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,939 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 135,199 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 86 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.