↓ Skip to main content

Spatiotemporal analysis of land-use change and its impact on surface runoff in Tsushima Island, Japan

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Environmental Science, July 2024
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Spatiotemporal analysis of land-use change and its impact on surface runoff in Tsushima Island, Japan
Published in
Frontiers in Environmental Science, July 2024
DOI 10.3389/fenvs.2024.1448542
Authors

Robby Yussac Tallar, Golan Geldoffer Mauregar, Eishi Hirose

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 July 2024.
All research outputs
#21,489,800
of 26,377,159 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Environmental Science
#1,885
of 4,913 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#89,166
of 139,595 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Environmental Science
#22
of 64 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,377,159 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,913 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 139,595 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 64 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.