The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Importance of Diagnostic Accuracy in Big Data: False-Positive Diagnoses of Type 2 Diabetes in Health Insurance Claims Data of 70 Million Germans
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Epidemiology, May 2022
|
DOI | 10.3389/fepid.2022.887335 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Ralph Brinks, Thaddäus Tönnies, Annika Hoyer |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Germany | 2 | 25% |
Switzerland | 1 | 13% |
Unknown | 5 | 63% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 6 | 75% |
Scientists | 2 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 March 2024.
All research outputs
#2,616,563
of 26,473,472 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Epidemiology
#13
of 183 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#55,773
of 450,052 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Epidemiology
#1
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,473,472 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 183 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 450,052 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.