↓ Skip to main content

Advancing DNA Barcoding and Metabarcoding Applications for Plants Requires Systematic Analysis of Herbarium Collections—An Australian Perspective

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution, September 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
10 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
90 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
195 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Advancing DNA Barcoding and Metabarcoding Applications for Plants Requires Systematic Analysis of Herbarium Collections—An Australian Perspective
Published in
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution, September 2018
DOI 10.3389/fevo.2018.00134
Authors

Eleanor E. Dormontt, Kor-jent van Dijk, Karen L. Bell, Ed Biffin, Martin F. Breed, Margaret Byrne, Stefan Caddy-Retalic, Francisco Encinas-Viso, Paul G. Nevill, Alison Shapcott, Jennifer M. Young, Michelle Waycott, Andrew J. Lowe

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 195 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 195 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 33 17%
Student > Master 25 13%
Researcher 23 12%
Student > Bachelor 20 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 4%
Other 30 15%
Unknown 56 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 66 34%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 37 19%
Environmental Science 15 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 2%
Engineering 3 2%
Other 13 7%
Unknown 57 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 October 2023.
All research outputs
#2,169,499
of 24,597,084 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
#771
of 4,967 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#44,766
of 342,240 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
#20
of 60 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,597,084 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,967 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 342,240 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 60 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.