The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Reconstruction of the Early Miocene Critical Zone at Loperot, Southwestern Turkana, Kenya
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution, February 2019
|
DOI | 10.3389/fevo.2019.00044 |
Authors |
Cynthia M. Liutkus-Pierce, Kevin K. Takashita-Bynum, Luke A. Beane, Cole T. Edwards, Oliver E. Burns, Sara Mana, Sidney Hemming, Aryeh Grossman, James D. Wright, Francis M. Kirera |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Switzerland | 1 | 50% |
South Africa | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 23 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 35% |
Student > Bachelor | 2 | 9% |
Professor | 2 | 9% |
Researcher | 2 | 9% |
Student > Master | 1 | 4% |
Other | 2 | 9% |
Unknown | 6 | 26% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 7 | 30% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 17% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 9% |
Environmental Science | 1 | 4% |
Design | 1 | 4% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 8 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 April 2019.
All research outputs
#7,070,412
of 23,128,387 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
#1,820
of 4,245 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#133,451
of 353,047 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
#76
of 113 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,128,387 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,245 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 353,047 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 113 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.