↓ Skip to main content

Spatial and Temporal Variability in Migration of a Soaring Raptor Across Three Continents

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution, September 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
3 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
126 X users
facebook
6 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
61 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
124 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Spatial and Temporal Variability in Migration of a Soaring Raptor Across Three Continents
Published in
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution, September 2019
DOI 10.3389/fevo.2019.00323
Authors

W. Louis Phipps, Pascual López-López, Evan R. Buechley, Steffen Oppel, Ernesto Álvarez, Volen Arkumarev, Rinur Bekmansurov, Oded Berger-Tal, Ana Bermejo, Anastasios Bounas, Isidoro Carbonell Alanís, Javier de la Puente, Vladimir Dobrev, Olivier Duriez, Ron Efrat, Guillaume Fréchet, Javier García, Manuel Galán, Clara García-Ripollés, Alberto Gil, Juan José Iglesias-Lebrija, José Jambas, Igor V. Karyakin, Erick Kobierzycki, Elzbieta Kret, Franziska Loercher, Antonio Monteiro, Jon Morant Etxebarria, Stoyan C. Nikolov, José Pereira, Lubomír Peške, Cecile Ponchon, Eduardo Realinho, Victoria Saravia, Cağan H. Sekercioğlu, Theodora Skartsi, José Tavares, Joaquim Teodósio, Vicente Urios, Núria Vallverdú

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 126 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 124 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 124 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 19%
Researcher 18 15%
Student > Bachelor 14 11%
Student > Master 12 10%
Other 5 4%
Other 16 13%
Unknown 36 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 48 39%
Environmental Science 27 22%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 2%
Unspecified 2 2%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 2 2%
Other 4 3%
Unknown 38 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 103. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 August 2021.
All research outputs
#438,070
of 26,454,856 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
#155
of 5,356 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,800
of 354,774 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
#3
of 124 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,454,856 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,356 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 354,774 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 124 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.