↓ Skip to main content

Neglected but Potent Dry Forest Players: Ecological Role and Ecosystem Service Provision of Biological Soil Crusts in the Human-Modified Caatinga

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution, December 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
59 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Neglected but Potent Dry Forest Players: Ecological Role and Ecosystem Service Provision of Biological Soil Crusts in the Human-Modified Caatinga
Published in
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution, December 2019
DOI 10.3389/fevo.2019.00482
Authors

Michelle Szyja, Artur Gonçalves de Souza Menezes, Flávia D. A. Oliveira, Inara Leal, Marcelo Tabarelli, Burkhard Büdel, Rainer Wirth

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 59 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 59 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 10 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 14%
Researcher 7 12%
Student > Master 6 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 8%
Other 8 14%
Unknown 15 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 19 32%
Environmental Science 16 27%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 3%
Unspecified 2 3%
Engineering 2 3%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 17 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 December 2019.
All research outputs
#15,590,077
of 23,177,498 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
#2,802
of 4,272 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#258,971
of 430,727 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
#97
of 120 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,177,498 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,272 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.5. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 430,727 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 120 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.