↓ Skip to main content

Nestmate Recognition in Social Insects: What Does It Mean to Be Chemically Insignificant?

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution, January 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Readers on

mendeley
37 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Nestmate Recognition in Social Insects: What Does It Mean to Be Chemically Insignificant?
Published in
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution, January 2020
DOI 10.3389/fevo.2019.00488
Authors

Maria Cristina Lorenzi, Patrizia d'Ettorre

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 37 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 22%
Researcher 5 14%
Student > Master 4 11%
Student > Bachelor 2 5%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 5%
Other 5 14%
Unknown 11 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 32%
Environmental Science 4 11%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 3%
Philosophy 1 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 3%
Other 3 8%
Unknown 15 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 January 2020.
All research outputs
#15,595,621
of 23,186,937 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
#2,809
of 4,277 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#274,520
of 456,680 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
#91
of 111 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,186,937 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,277 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.5. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 456,680 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 111 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.