The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 48 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Ignoring Fossil Age Uncertainty Leads to Inaccurate Topology and Divergence Time Estimates in Time Calibrated Tree Inference
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution, June 2020
|
DOI | 10.3389/fevo.2020.00183 |
Authors |
Joëlle Barido-Sottani, Nina M. A. van Tiel, Melanie J. Hopkins, David F. Wright, Tanja Stadler, Rachel C. M. Warnock |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 5 | 10% |
Canada | 1 | 2% |
Denmark | 1 | 2% |
Italy | 1 | 2% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 39 | 81% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Scientists | 27 | 56% |
Members of the public | 21 | 44% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 39 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 26% |
Researcher | 8 | 21% |
Other | 4 | 10% |
Student > Bachelor | 3 | 8% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 5% |
Other | 6 | 15% |
Unknown | 6 | 15% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 14 | 36% |
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 10 | 26% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 8% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 3% |
Computer Science | 1 | 3% |
Other | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 9 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 26. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 May 2024.
All research outputs
#1,530,920
of 26,014,510 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
#528
of 5,318 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,969
of 436,250 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
#16
of 143 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,014,510 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,318 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 436,250 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 143 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.