↓ Skip to main content

Predicting Plant-Soil Feedback in the Field: Meta-Analysis Reveals That Competition and Environmental Stress Differentially Influence PSF

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution, June 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (77th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
14 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
61 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
103 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Predicting Plant-Soil Feedback in the Field: Meta-Analysis Reveals That Competition and Environmental Stress Differentially Influence PSF
Published in
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution, June 2020
DOI 10.3389/fevo.2020.00191
Authors

Kendall K. Beals, Jessica A. M. Moore, Stephanie N. Kivlin, Shannon L. J. Bayliss, Candice Y. Lumibao, Leigh C. Moorhead, Megan Patel, Jennifer L. Summers, Ian M. Ware, Joseph K. Bailey, Jennifer A. Schweitzer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 103 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 103 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 26 25%
Student > Bachelor 12 12%
Student > Master 12 12%
Researcher 10 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 7%
Other 8 8%
Unknown 28 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 39 38%
Environmental Science 18 17%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 3%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 3 3%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 2%
Other 6 6%
Unknown 32 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 July 2020.
All research outputs
#3,784,701
of 25,885,956 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
#1,213
of 5,307 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#96,260
of 434,402 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
#38
of 140 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,885,956 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,307 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 434,402 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 140 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.