You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The Complete Mitochondrial Genome of Suidasia nesbitti and Phylogenetic Relationships of Astigmata
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution, July 2020
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fevo.2020.00194 |
| Authors |
Fangyuan Dong, Weixi Fang, Yu Fang, Xuebing Zhan, Dongdong Tao, Xuan Su, Jiaoyang Xu, Yan Wang, Fei Liu, Yinhua Liu, Bing Chen, Xingquan Xia, Entao Sun |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 July 2023.
All research outputs
#7,296,242
of 24,074,860 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
#1,880
of 4,759 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#149,308
of 400,162 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
#66
of 137 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,074,860 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,759 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 400,162 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 137 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.