The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Application of the Conservation Planning Tool Zonation to Inform Retention Planning in the Boreal Forest of Western Canada
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution, December 2020
|
DOI | 10.3389/fevo.2020.584291 |
Authors |
François-Nicolas Robinne, J. John Stadt, Christopher W. Bater, Charles A. Nock, S. Ellen Macdonald, Scott E. Nielsen |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Canada | 2 | 29% |
Unknown | 5 | 71% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 5 | 71% |
Scientists | 2 | 29% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 38 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 38 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 8 | 21% |
Student > Master | 4 | 11% |
Student > Bachelor | 3 | 8% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 8% |
Other | 2 | 5% |
Other | 4 | 11% |
Unknown | 14 | 37% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Environmental Science | 8 | 21% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 21% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 3% |
Computer Science | 1 | 3% |
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 1 | 3% |
Other | 2 | 5% |
Unknown | 17 | 45% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 December 2020.
All research outputs
#7,122,998
of 23,267,128 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
#1,839
of 4,313 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#177,666
of 508,622 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
#84
of 163 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,267,128 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,313 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 508,622 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 163 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.