↓ Skip to main content

DNA-Based Arthropod Diversity Assessment in Amazonian Iron Mine Lands Show Ecological Succession Towards Undisturbed Reference Sites

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution, December 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (56th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
10 X users

Readers on

mendeley
40 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
DNA-Based Arthropod Diversity Assessment in Amazonian Iron Mine Lands Show Ecological Succession Towards Undisturbed Reference Sites
Published in
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution, December 2020
DOI 10.3389/fevo.2020.590976
Authors

Christina Lynggaard, Douglas W. Yu, Guilherme Oliveira, Cecilio F. Caldeira, Silvio J. Ramos, Martin R. Ellegaard, M. Thomas P. Gilbert, Markus Gastauer, Kristine Bohmann

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 40 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 8 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 15%
Researcher 5 13%
Student > Bachelor 4 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 8%
Other 4 10%
Unknown 10 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 28%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 15%
Environmental Science 4 10%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 3%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 3%
Other 4 10%
Unknown 13 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 December 2020.
All research outputs
#6,576,523
of 26,202,139 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
#1,675
of 5,322 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#148,916
of 532,920 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
#75
of 174 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,202,139 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,322 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 532,920 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 174 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.