You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Consequences of Replacing Native Savannahs With Acacia Plantations for the Taxonomic, Functional, and Phylogenetic α- and β-Diversity of Bats in the Northern Brazilian Amazon
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution, December 2020
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fevo.2020.609214 |
| Authors |
William Douglas Carvalho, Christoph F. J. Meyer, Bruna da Silva Xavier, Karen Mustin, Isaí Jorge de Castro, Saulo M. Silvestre, Dinah B. Pathek, Ubirajara D. Capaverde, Renato Hilário, José Júlio de Toledo |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 4 | 33% |
| Spain | 2 | 17% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 8% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 8% |
| Colombia | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 3 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 50% |
| Scientists | 5 | 42% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 53 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 53 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 9 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 8 | 15% |
| Unknown | 13 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 25 | 47% |
| Environmental Science | 7 | 13% |
| Engineering | 2 | 4% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 2% |
| Decision Sciences | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 16 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 December 2020.
All research outputs
#6,611,440
of 25,724,500 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
#1,701
of 5,295 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#151,628
of 527,163 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
#72
of 166 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,724,500 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,295 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 527,163 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 166 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.