↓ Skip to main content

Different Effects of Mineral Versus Vegetal Granular Activated Carbon Filters on the Microbial Community Composition of a Drinking Water Treatment Plant

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution, March 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (65th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (52nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
17 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Different Effects of Mineral Versus Vegetal Granular Activated Carbon Filters on the Microbial Community Composition of a Drinking Water Treatment Plant
Published in
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution, March 2021
DOI 10.3389/fevo.2021.615513
Authors

Antonia Bruno, Anna Sandionigi, Davide Magnani, Marzia Bernasconi, Bruno Pannuzzo, Clarissa Consolandi, Tania Camboni, Massimo Labra, Maurizio Casiraghi

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 17 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 24%
Researcher 3 18%
Student > Bachelor 2 12%
Unspecified 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Other 2 12%
Unknown 4 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 18%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 12%
Unspecified 1 6%
Linguistics 1 6%
Environmental Science 1 6%
Other 2 12%
Unknown 7 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 February 2023.
All research outputs
#7,257,925
of 25,312,451 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
#1,883
of 5,204 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#149,872
of 433,248 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
#112
of 234 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,312,451 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,204 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 433,248 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 234 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.