↓ Skip to main content

Modeling the Ecological Responses of Tree Species to the Flood Pulse of the Amazon Negro River Floodplains

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution, April 2021
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
49 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Modeling the Ecological Responses of Tree Species to the Flood Pulse of the Amazon Negro River Floodplains
Published in
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution, April 2021
DOI 10.3389/fevo.2021.628606
Authors

John Ethan Householder, Jochen Schöngart, Maria T. F. Piedade, Wolfgang J. Junk, Hans ter Steege, Juan Carlos Montero, Rafael L. de Assis, Daniel Praia Portela de Aguiar, Maihyra Marina Pombo, Adriano Costa Quaresma, Layon O. Demarchi, Pia Parolin, Aline Lopes, Gildo Vieira Feitoza, Flávia Machado Durgante, Bianca Weiss Albuquerque, Antonia Chu, Daniel Enßlin, Tobias Fabian, Kirke Fettweiß, Moritz Hirsch, Myriam Hombach, Alisa Hubbuch, Benedikt Hutter, Timo Jäger, Ronja Kober-Moritz, Meike K. R. Lindner, Felix Maier, Julia Nowak, Zoe Petridis, Larissa Schierling, Erika Snjaric, Gregory Egger, Erika Schneider, Christian Damm, Florian Wittmann

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 49 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 49 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 18%
Student > Master 7 14%
Student > Bachelor 3 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 4%
Other 7 14%
Unknown 18 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 27%
Environmental Science 10 20%
Unspecified 2 4%
Arts and Humanities 1 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Other 3 6%
Unknown 19 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 April 2021.
All research outputs
#18,801,532
of 23,301,510 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
#3,188
of 4,330 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#321,431
of 431,489 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
#192
of 230 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,301,510 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,330 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.5. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 431,489 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 230 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.