The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 109 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Think Before You Act: Improving the Conservation Outcomes of CITES Listing Decisions
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution, April 2021
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fevo.2021.631556 |
| Authors |
Rosie Cooney, Daniel W. S. Challender, Steven Broad, Dilys Roe, Daniel J. D. Natusch |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 9 | 8% |
| Canada | 5 | 5% |
| United States | 5 | 5% |
| Nepal | 2 | 2% |
| Belgium | 2 | 2% |
| Tanzania, United Republic of | 2 | 2% |
| Belize | 1 | <1% |
| Namibia | 1 | <1% |
| Peru | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 5 | 5% |
| Unknown | 76 | 70% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 83 | 76% |
| Scientists | 23 | 21% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 78 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 78 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 18 | 23% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 7 | 9% |
| Unknown | 27 | 35% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 18 | 23% |
| Environmental Science | 17 | 22% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 5% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 4% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 4 | 5% |
| Unknown | 31 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 82. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 December 2022.
All research outputs
#544,337
of 26,216,692 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
#205
of 5,323 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,334
of 457,313 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
#12
of 224 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,216,692 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,323 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 457,313 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 224 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.