↓ Skip to main content

The Utility of Macroecological Rules for Microbial Biogeography

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution, April 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
31 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
37 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
89 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The Utility of Macroecological Rules for Microbial Biogeography
Published in
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution, April 2021
DOI 10.3389/fevo.2021.633155
Authors

Jonathan R. Dickey, Rachel A. Swenie, Sophia C. Turner, Claire C. Winfrey, Daniela Yaffar, Anchal Padukone, Kendall K. Beals, Kimberly S. Sheldon, Stephanie N. Kivlin

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 31 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 89 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 89 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 22%
Researcher 9 10%
Student > Postgraduate 9 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 9%
Student > Master 8 9%
Other 14 16%
Unknown 21 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 25 28%
Environmental Science 12 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 12 13%
Unspecified 3 3%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 2 2%
Other 8 9%
Unknown 27 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 November 2021.
All research outputs
#1,946,037
of 26,356,696 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
#661
of 5,338 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#50,741
of 460,484 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
#38
of 231 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,356,696 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,338 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 460,484 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 231 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.