The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The Silent Threat of Non-native Fish in the Amazon: ANNF Database and Review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution, June 2021
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fevo.2021.646702 |
| Authors |
Carolina Rodrigues da Costa Doria, Edwin Agudelo, Alberto Akama, Bruno Barros, Mariana Bonfim, Laís Carneiro, Sylvio Romério Briglia-Ferreira, Lucélia Nobre Carvalho, César Augusto Bonilla-Castillo, Patricia Charvet, Dayana Tamiris Brito dos Santos Catâneo, Hugmar Pains da Silva, Carmen Rosa Garcia-Dávila, Hélio Daniel Beltrão dos Anjos, Fabrice Duponchelle, Andrea Encalada, Izaias Fernandes, Alexandro Cezar Florentino, Paula Carolina Paes Guarido, Tharles Lopes de Oliveira Guedes, Luz Jimenez-Segura, Oscar Miguel Lasso-Alcalá, Marc Ruben Macean, Elineide Eugênio Marques, Raimundo Nonato G. Mendes-Júnior, Guido Miranda-Chumacero, Jorge Luiz Silva Nunes, Thiago Vinícius Trento Occhi, Leonardo Silva Pereira, William Castro-Pulido, Lariessa Soares, Raniere Garcez Costa Sousa, Gislene Torrente-Vilara, Paul André Van Damme, Jansen Zuanon, Jean Ricardo Simões Vitule |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 2 | 14% |
| China | 1 | 7% |
| United States | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 10 | 71% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 7 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 5 | 36% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 69 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 69 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 11 | 16% |
| Professor | 10 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 8 | 12% |
| Unknown | 22 | 32% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 23 | 33% |
| Environmental Science | 9 | 13% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 3 | 4% |
| Engineering | 3 | 4% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 3 | 4% |
| Unknown | 27 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 August 2021.
All research outputs
#2,119,057
of 26,364,993 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
#719
of 5,342 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#51,833
of 463,299 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
#41
of 243 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,364,993 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,342 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 463,299 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 243 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.