The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A Scoping Review of Species Distribution Modeling Methods for Tick Vectors
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution, June 2022
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fevo.2022.893016 |
| Authors |
Heather L. Kopsco, Rebecca L. Smith, Samniqueka J. Halsey |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 50% |
| Unknown | 3 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 50% |
| Scientists | 2 | 33% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 45 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 6 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 11% |
| Unspecified | 5 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 6 | 13% |
| Unknown | 17 | 38% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 10 | 22% |
| Unspecified | 5 | 11% |
| Environmental Science | 4 | 9% |
| Engineering | 4 | 9% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 4 | 9% |
| Unknown | 16 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 July 2022.
All research outputs
#6,971,469
of 22,858,915 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
#1,790
of 4,109 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#136,638
of 438,960 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
#102
of 344 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,858,915 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,109 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 438,960 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 344 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.