↓ Skip to main content

Quantitative relationship between cladocera and cyanobacteria: A study based on field survey

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution, July 2022
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
2 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Quantitative relationship between cladocera and cyanobacteria: A study based on field survey
Published in
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution, July 2022
DOI 10.3389/fevo.2022.915787
Authors

Daikui Li, Ping He, Cunqi Liu, Jie Xu, Liping Hou, Xiuli Gao, Dewang Wang, Jiawen Wang

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 July 2022.
All research outputs
#20,335,423
of 22,880,230 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
#3,497
of 4,121 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#346,349
of 434,156 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
#259
of 352 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,880,230 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,121 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.8. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 434,156 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 352 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.