The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Methods for robust estimates of tree biomass from pollen accumulation rates: Quantifying paleoecological reconstruction uncertainty
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution, August 2022
|
DOI | 10.3389/fevo.2022.956143 |
Authors |
Clarke A. Knight, John J. Battles, M. Jane Bunting, Marie Champagne, James A. Wanket, David B. Wahl |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 2 | 67% |
Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 7 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 3 | 43% |
Student > Master | 2 | 29% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 14% |
Unknown | 1 | 14% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 29% |
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 2 | 29% |
Environmental Science | 1 | 14% |
Social Sciences | 1 | 14% |
Unknown | 1 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 August 2022.
All research outputs
#14,946,571
of 23,202,641 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
#2,577
of 4,291 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#214,741
of 433,052 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
#132
of 317 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,202,641 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,291 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.5. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 433,052 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 317 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.