The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Longitudinal section cell morphology of Chinese fir roots and the relationship between root structure and function
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution, February 2023
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fevo.2023.1122860 |
| Authors |
Linxin Li, Ting Zhang, Jingquan Lin, Xiaoqian Lian, Xianhua Zou, Xiangqing Ma, Pengfei Wu |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 February 2023.
All research outputs
#20,713,549
of 23,313,051 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
#3,661
of 4,337 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#265,323
of 340,287 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
#186
of 280 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,313,051 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,337 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.5. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 340,287 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 280 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.