The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 49 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Impact of landscape configuration and composition on pollinator communities across different European biogeographic regions
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution, May 2023
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fevo.2023.1128228 |
| Authors |
Irene Bottero, Christophe Dominik, Olivier Schweiger, Matthias Albrecht, Eleanor Attridge, Mark J. F. Brown, Elena Cini, Cecilia Costa, Pilar De la Rúa, Joachim R. de Miranda, Gennaro Di Prisco, Daniel Dzul Uuh, Simon Hodge, Kjell Ivarsson, Anina C. Knauer, Alexandra-Maria Klein, Marika Mänd, Vicente Martínez-López, Piotr Medrzycki, Helena Pereira-Peixoto, Simon Potts, Risto Raimets, Rundlöf, Janine M. Schwarz, Deepa Senapathi, Giovanni Tamburini, Estefanía Tobajas Talaván, Jane C. Stout |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Ireland | 4 | 8% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 6% |
| Brazil | 2 | 4% |
| Germany | 2 | 4% |
| United States | 1 | 2% |
| Portugal | 1 | 2% |
| Nepal | 1 | 2% |
| India | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 34 | 69% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 27 | 55% |
| Scientists | 20 | 41% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 2% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 44 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 44 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 12 | 27% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 9% |
| Professor | 3 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 7% |
| Other | 2 | 5% |
| Unknown | 14 | 32% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 16 | 36% |
| Environmental Science | 5 | 11% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 5% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 2% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 2 | 5% |
| Unknown | 17 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 30. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 July 2024.
All research outputs
#1,375,712
of 26,325,711 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
#469
of 5,333 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,131
of 414,027 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
#14
of 318 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,325,711 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,333 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 414,027 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 318 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.