The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Editorial: Modeling large-scale ecological and evolutionary dynamics
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution, February 2023
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fevo.2023.1147516 |
| Authors |
Sidney F. Gouveia, Shan Huang |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Sweden | 1 | 20% |
| Brazil | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 3 | 60% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 60% |
| Scientists | 2 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 February 2023.
All research outputs
#13,932,971
of 24,302,917 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
#2,261
of 4,851 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#163,642
of 411,556 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
#92
of 353 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,302,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,851 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 411,556 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 353 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.