You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Sustained beneficial infections: priority effects, competition, and specialization drive patterns of association in intracellular mutualisms
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution, December 2023
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fevo.2023.1221012 |
| Authors |
Malcolm Hill, Barry Lawson, John W. Cain, Nasheya Rahman, Shiv Toolsidass, Tongyu Wang, Sara Geraghty, Eberardo Raymundo, April Hill |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Switzerland | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 December 2023.
All research outputs
#17,832,890
of 26,122,087 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
#3,256
of 5,321 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#202,970
of 376,000 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
#53
of 167 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,122,087 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,321 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 376,000 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 167 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.