↓ Skip to main content

Editorial: Freshwater biodiversity and ecosystem functioning: novel ideas and approaches

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution, January 2024
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Editorial: Freshwater biodiversity and ecosystem functioning: novel ideas and approaches
Published in
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution, January 2024
DOI 10.3389/fevo.2023.1355026
Authors

Tao Tang, Danny Chun Pong Lau, Ming-Chih Chiu, Patrick Venail

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 January 2024.
All research outputs
#21,400,044
of 26,262,977 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
#3,733
of 5,328 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#265,011
of 375,840 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
#71
of 160 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,262,977 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,328 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.4. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 375,840 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 160 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.