↓ Skip to main content

Distance models reveal biases associated with passive trapping methods for measuring wild bee abundance

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution, May 2024
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
6 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Distance models reveal biases associated with passive trapping methods for measuring wild bee abundance
Published in
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution, May 2024
DOI 10.3389/fevo.2024.1380622
Authors

Codey L. Mathis, Darin J. McNeil, Melanie Kammerer, Jeffery L. Larkin, Michael J. Skvarla

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 6 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor > Associate Professor 1 17%
Researcher 1 17%
Unknown 4 67%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 17%
Engineering 1 17%
Unknown 4 67%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 April 2024.
All research outputs
#21,132,891
of 25,958,626 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
#3,695
of 5,312 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#96,108
of 144,390 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
#16
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,958,626 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,312 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.2. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 144,390 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.