The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 131 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Reducing Fertilizer and Avoiding Herbicides in Oil Palm Plantations—Ecological and Economic Valuations
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Forests and Global Change, November 2019
|
| DOI | 10.3389/ffgc.2019.00065 |
| Authors |
Kevin F. A. Darras, Marife D. Corre, Greta Formaglio, Aiyen Tjoa, Anton Potapov, Fabian Brambach, Kibrom T. Sibhatu, Ingo Grass, Andres Angulo Rubiano, Damayanti Buchori, Jochen Drescher, Riko Fardiansah, Dirk Hölscher, Bambang Irawan, Thomas Kneib, Valentyna Krashevska, Alena Krause, Holger Kreft, Kevin Li, Mark Maraun, Andrea Polle, Aisjah R. Ryadin, Katja Rembold, Christian Stiegler, Stefan Scheu, Suria Tarigan, Alejandra Valdés-Uribe, Supri Yadi, Teja Tscharntke, Edzo Veldkamp |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| India | 10 | 8% |
| Nigeria | 10 | 8% |
| Germany | 6 | 5% |
| Indonesia | 4 | 3% |
| South Africa | 2 | 2% |
| Tanzania, United Republic of | 2 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 2% |
| Switzerland | 2 | 2% |
| Uganda | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 18 | 14% |
| Unknown | 74 | 56% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 112 | 85% |
| Scientists | 15 | 11% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 2% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 252 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 252 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 48 | 19% |
| Student > Bachelor | 30 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 22 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 22 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 14 | 6% |
| Other | 30 | 12% |
| Unknown | 86 | 34% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 78 | 31% |
| Environmental Science | 29 | 12% |
| Computer Science | 7 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 2% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 6 | 2% |
| Other | 33 | 13% |
| Unknown | 93 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 176. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 May 2022.
All research outputs
#242,861
of 26,408,935 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Forests and Global Change
#19
of 1,240 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,194
of 385,738 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Forests and Global Change
#1
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,408,935 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,240 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 385,738 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.