The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 49 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Tradeoffs and Synergies in Tropical Forest Root Traits and Dynamics for Nutrient and Water Acquisition: Field and Modeling Advances
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Forests and Global Change, December 2021
|
| DOI | 10.3389/ffgc.2021.704469 |
| Authors |
Daniela Francis Cusack, Shalom D. Addo-Danso, Elizabeth A. Agee, Kelly M. Andersen, Marie Arnaud, Sarah A. Batterman, Francis Q. Brearley, Mark I. Ciochina, Amanda L. Cordeiro, Caroline Dallstream, Milton H. Diaz-Toribio, Lee H. Dietterich, Joshua B. Fisher, Katrin Fleischer, Claire Fortunel, Lucia Fuchslueger, Nathaly R. Guerrero-Ramírez, Martyna M. Kotowska, Laynara Figueiredo Lugli, César Marín, Lindsay A. McCulloch, Jean-Luc Maeght, Dan Metcalfe, Richard J. Norby, Rafael S. Oliveira, Jennifer S. Powers, Tatiana Reichert, Stuart W. Smith, Chris M. Smith-Martin, Fiona M. Soper, Laura Toro, Maria N. Umaña, Oscar Valverde-Barrantes, Monique Weemstra, Leland K. Werden, Michelle Wong, Cynthia L. Wright, Stuart Joseph Wright, Daniela Yaffar |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 8 | 16% |
| Belgium | 1 | 2% |
| Germany | 1 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
| France | 1 | 2% |
| Puerto Rico | 1 | 2% |
| Denmark | 1 | 2% |
| Singapore | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 34 | 69% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 27 | 55% |
| Scientists | 20 | 41% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 81 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 81 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 20% |
| Researcher | 12 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 6 | 7% |
| Unknown | 25 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 24 | 30% |
| Environmental Science | 17 | 21% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 4% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 2 | 2% |
| Engineering | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 4 | 5% |
| Unknown | 29 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 29. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 February 2024.
All research outputs
#1,411,875
of 26,186,522 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Forests and Global Change
#84
of 1,222 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,746
of 528,050 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Forests and Global Change
#4
of 70 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,186,522 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,222 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 528,050 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 70 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.