The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Natural regeneration of cork oak forests under climate change: a case study in Portugal
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Forests and Global Change, June 2024
|
| DOI | 10.3389/ffgc.2024.1332708 |
| Authors |
Stéphanie Ribeiro, Adelaide Cerveira, Paula Soares, Nuno Almeida Ribeiro, Constança Camilo-Alves, Teresa Fidalgo Fonseca |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 1 | 100% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 June 2024.
All research outputs
#3,952,769
of 26,147,626 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Forests and Global Change
#236
of 1,217 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,766
of 165,326 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Forests and Global Change
#10
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,147,626 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,217 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 165,326 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.