The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
CRISPR-Cas9 immune-evasive hESCs are rejected following transplantation into immunocompetent mice
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Genome Editing, May 2024
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fgeed.2024.1403395 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Henriette Reventlow Frederiksen, Alexandra Glantz, Kåre Kryger Vøls, Søren Skov, Pernille Tveden-Nyborg, Kristine Freude, Ulrik Doehn |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 3 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 June 2024.
All research outputs
#17,834,431
of 26,126,599 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Genome Editing
#148
of 208 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#100,270
of 199,700 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Genome Editing
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,126,599 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 208 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 199,700 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them