↓ Skip to main content

Autoantibodies to neurotransmitter receptors and ion channels: from neuromuscular to neuropsychiatric disorders

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Genetics, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users

Readers on

mendeley
86 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Autoantibodies to neurotransmitter receptors and ion channels: from neuromuscular to neuropsychiatric disorders
Published in
Frontiers in Genetics, January 2013
DOI 10.3389/fgene.2013.00181
Pubmed ID
Authors

Pilar Martinez-Martinez, Peter C. Molenaar, Mario Losen, Jo Stevens, Marc H. De Baets, Andrei Szoke, Jerome Honnorat, Ryad Tamouza, Marion Leboyer, Jim Van Os, Bart P. F. Rutten

Abstract

Changes of voltage-gated ion channels and ligand-gated receptor channels caused by mutation or autoimmune attack are the cause of so-called channelopathies in the central and peripheral nervous system. We present the pathophysiology of channelopathies of the neuromuscular junction in terms of loss-of-function and gain-of-function principles. Autoantibodies generally have reduced access to the central nervous system, but in some cases this is enough to cause disease. A review is provided of recent findings implicating autoantibodies against ligand-activated receptor channels and potassium channels in psychiatric and neurological disorders, including schizophrenia and limbic encephalitis. The emergence of channelopathy-related neuropsychiatric disorders has implications for research and practice.

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 86 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 2 2%
Netherlands 1 1%
Chile 1 1%
Australia 1 1%
Poland 1 1%
Unknown 80 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 17%
Researcher 11 13%
Other 8 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 8 9%
Student > Postgraduate 7 8%
Other 23 27%
Unknown 14 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 28 33%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 19 22%
Neuroscience 11 13%
Psychology 4 5%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 3%
Other 6 7%
Unknown 15 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 December 2015.
All research outputs
#7,088,283
of 23,340,595 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Genetics
#2,192
of 12,364 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#76,614
of 283,897 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Genetics
#93
of 318 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,340,595 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,364 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 283,897 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 318 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.