↓ Skip to main content

Competing endogenous RNAs (ceRNAs): new entrants to the intricacies of gene regulation

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Genetics, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
peer_reviews
1 peer review site

Citations

dimensions_citation
338 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
213 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Competing endogenous RNAs (ceRNAs): new entrants to the intricacies of gene regulation
Published in
Frontiers in Genetics, January 2014
DOI 10.3389/fgene.2014.00008
Pubmed ID
Authors

Reena V. Kartha, Subbaya Subramanian

Abstract

The discovery of microRNAs (miRNAs) has led to a paradigm shift in our basic understanding of gene regulation. Competing endogenous RNAs (ceRNAs) are the recent entrants adding to the complexities of miRNA mediated gene regulation. ceRNAs are RNAs that share miRNA recognition elements (MREs) thereby regulating each other. It is apparent that miRNAs act as rheostats that fine-tune gene expression and maintain the functional balance of various gene networks. Thus MREs in coding and non-coding transcripts have evolved to become the crosstalk hubs of gene interactions, affecting the expression levels and activities of different ceRNAs. Decoding the crosstalk between MREs mediated by ceRNAs is critical to delineate the intricacies in gene regulation, and we have just begun to unravel this complexity.

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 213 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Denmark 2 <1%
Chile 2 <1%
China 2 <1%
France 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Poland 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 201 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 43 20%
Researcher 33 15%
Student > Master 28 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 15 7%
Student > Bachelor 15 7%
Other 36 17%
Unknown 43 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 61 29%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 57 27%
Medicine and Dentistry 17 8%
Computer Science 8 4%
Neuroscience 5 2%
Other 20 9%
Unknown 45 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 January 2014.
All research outputs
#14,188,008
of 22,741,406 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Genetics
#3,906
of 11,757 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#173,615
of 305,211 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Genetics
#32
of 54 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,741,406 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,757 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 305,211 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 54 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.