↓ Skip to main content

Common features of microRNA target prediction tools

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Genetics, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
q&a
1 Q&A thread

Citations

dimensions_citation
384 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
640 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Common features of microRNA target prediction tools
Published in
Frontiers in Genetics, January 2014
DOI 10.3389/fgene.2014.00023
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sarah M. Peterson, Jeffrey A. Thompson, Melanie L. Ufkin, Pradeep Sathyanarayana, Lucy Liaw, Clare Bates Congdon

Abstract

The human genome encodes for over 1800 microRNAs (miRNAs), which are short non-coding RNA molecules that function to regulate gene expression post-transcriptionally. Due to the potential for one miRNA to target multiple gene transcripts, miRNAs are recognized as a major mechanism to regulate gene expression and mRNA translation. Computational prediction of miRNA targets is a critical initial step in identifying miRNA:mRNA target interactions for experimental validation. The available tools for miRNA target prediction encompass a range of different computational approaches, from the modeling of physical interactions to the incorporation of machine learning. This review provides an overview of the major computational approaches to miRNA target prediction. Our discussion highlights three tools for their ease of use, reliance on relatively updated versions of miRBase, and range of capabilities, and these are DIANA-microT-CDS, miRanda-mirSVR, and TargetScan. In comparison across all miRNA target prediction tools, four main aspects of the miRNA:mRNA target interaction emerge as common features on which most target prediction is based: seed match, conservation, free energy, and site accessibility. This review explains these features and identifies how they are incorporated into currently available target prediction tools. MiRNA target prediction is a dynamic field with increasing attention on development of new analysis tools. This review attempts to provide a comprehensive assessment of these tools in a manner that is accessible across disciplines. Understanding the basis of these prediction methodologies will aid in user selection of the appropriate tools and interpretation of the tool output.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 640 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 4 <1%
Spain 3 <1%
Italy 3 <1%
India 2 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Uruguay 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Israel 1 <1%
Other 10 2%
Unknown 613 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 165 26%
Researcher 94 15%
Student > Master 94 15%
Student > Bachelor 60 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 40 6%
Other 69 11%
Unknown 118 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 184 29%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 182 28%
Medicine and Dentistry 37 6%
Computer Science 25 4%
Neuroscience 14 2%
Other 56 9%
Unknown 142 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 July 2018.
All research outputs
#3,929,468
of 22,745,803 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Genetics
#1,189
of 11,758 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#47,163
of 305,223 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Genetics
#10
of 54 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,745,803 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,758 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 305,223 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 54 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.