The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Stratified randomization controls better for batch effects in 450K methylation analysis: a cautionary tale
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Genetics, October 2014
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fgene.2014.00354 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Olive D. Buhule, Ryan L. Minster, Nicola L. Hawley, Mario Medvedovic, Guangyun Sun, Satupaitea Viali, Ranjan Deka, Stephen T. McGarvey, Daniel E. Weeks |
| Abstract |
Batch effects in DNA methylation microarray experiments can lead to spurious results if not properly handled during the plating of samples. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 81 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Turkey | 1 | 1% |
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| Sweden | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 78 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 24 | 30% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 9% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 11 | 14% |
| Unknown | 12 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 22 | 27% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 22 | 27% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 11% |
| Computer Science | 4 | 5% |
| Psychology | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 7 | 9% |
| Unknown | 15 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 November 2014.
All research outputs
#17,039,477
of 25,040,629 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Genetics
#6,080
of 13,486 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#155,474
of 262,031 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Genetics
#81
of 115 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,040,629 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,486 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 262,031 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 115 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.