↓ Skip to main content

An appraisal of RECQ1 expression in cancer progression

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Genetics, December 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
16 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
An appraisal of RECQ1 expression in cancer progression
Published in
Frontiers in Genetics, December 2014
DOI 10.3389/fgene.2014.00426
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sudha Sharma

Abstract

RECQ1 is the most abundant member of the human RecQ family of DNA helicases genetically linked with cancer predisposition syndromes and well known for their functions in genome stability maintenance through DNA repair. Despite being the first discovered RecQ homolog in humans, biological functions of RECQ1 have remained largely underappreciated and its relevance to cellular transformation is yet unclear. RECQ1 is overexpressed and amplified in many clinical cancer samples. In silico evaluation of RECQ1 mRNA expression across the NCI-60 cancer cell lines predicts an association of RECQ1 with cancer cell migration, invasion, and metastasis. Consistent with this, latest work implicates RECQ1 in regulation of gene expression, especially of those associated with cancer progression. Functionally, silencing RECQ1 expression significantly reduces cell proliferation, migration, and invasion. Collectively, these results propose that discerning the role of RECQ1 in conferring proliferative and invasive phenotype to cancer cells could be useful in developing therapeutic strategies to block primary tumor progression and metastasis.

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Croatia 1 6%
Unknown 15 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 4 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 25%
Student > Master 2 13%
Researcher 2 13%
Student > Postgraduate 1 6%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 3 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 31%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 19%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 13%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 6%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 3 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 February 2015.
All research outputs
#14,205,797
of 22,772,779 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Genetics
#3,914
of 11,759 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#190,981
of 359,774 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Genetics
#70
of 114 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,772,779 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,759 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 359,774 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 114 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.