↓ Skip to main content

DDR-mediated crosstalk between DNA-damaged cells and their microenvironment

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Genetics, March 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
95 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
144 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
DDR-mediated crosstalk between DNA-damaged cells and their microenvironment
Published in
Frontiers in Genetics, March 2015
DOI 10.3389/fgene.2015.00094
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nicolas Malaquin, Audrey Carrier-Leclerc, Mireille Dessureault, Francis Rodier

Abstract

The DNA damage response (DDR) is an evolutionarily conserved signaling cascade that senses and responds to double-strand DNA breaks by organizing downstream cellular events, ranging from appropriate DNA repair to cell cycle checkpoints. In higher organisms, the DDR prevents neoplastic transformation by directly protecting the information contained in the genome and by regulating cell fate decisions, like apoptosis and senescence, to ensure the removal of severely damaged cells. In addition to these well-studied cell-autonomous effects, emerging evidence now shows that the DDR signaling cascade can also function in a paracrine manner, thus influencing the biology of the surrounding cellular microenvironment. In this context, the DDR plays an emerging role in shaping the damaged tumor microenvironment through the regulation of tissue repair and local immune responses, thereby providing a promising avenue for novel therapeutic interventions. Additionally, while DDR-mediated extracellular signals can convey information to surrounding, undamaged cells, they can also feedback onto DNA-damaged cells to reinforce selected signaling pathways. Overall, these extracellular DDR signals can be subdivided into two time-specific waves: a rapid bystander effect occurring within a few hours of DNA damage; and a late, delayed, senescence-associated secretory phenotype generally requiring multiple days to establish. Here, we highlight and discuss examples of rapid and late DDR-mediated extracellular alarm signals.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 144 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
Unknown 143 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 41 28%
Student > Master 20 14%
Student > Bachelor 17 12%
Researcher 15 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 6%
Other 11 8%
Unknown 32 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 44 31%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 33 23%
Medicine and Dentistry 16 11%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 3%
Immunology and Microbiology 4 3%
Other 9 6%
Unknown 34 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 December 2017.
All research outputs
#14,805,023
of 22,794,367 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Genetics
#4,474
of 11,761 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#145,148
of 259,041 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Genetics
#117
of 156 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,794,367 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,761 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 259,041 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 156 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.