↓ Skip to main content

Genotype by environment interaction and breeding for robustness in livestock

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Genetics, October 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
98 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
237 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Genotype by environment interaction and breeding for robustness in livestock
Published in
Frontiers in Genetics, October 2015
DOI 10.3389/fgene.2015.00310
Pubmed ID
Authors

Wendy M. Rauw, Luis Gomez-Raya

Abstract

The increasing size of the human population is projected to result in an increase in meat consumption. However, at the same time, the dominant position of meat as the center of meals is on the decline. Modern objections to the consumption of meat include public concerns with animal welfare in livestock production systems. Animal breeding practices have become part of the debate since it became recognized that animals in a population that have been selected for high production efficiency are more at risk for behavioral, physiological and immunological problems. As a solution, animal breeding practices need to include selection for robustness traits, which can be implemented through the use of reaction norms analysis, or though the direct inclusion of robustness traits in the breeding objective and in the selection index. This review gives an overview of genotype × environment interactions (the influence of the environment, reaction norms, phenotypic plasticity, canalization, and genetic homeostasis), reaction norms analysis in livestock production, options for selection for increased levels of production and against environmental sensitivity, and direct inclusion of robustness traits in the selection index. Ethical considerations of breeding for improved animal welfare are discussed. The discussion on animal breeding practices has been initiated and is very alive today. This positive trend is part of the sustainable food production movement that aims at feeding 9.15 billion people not just in the near future but also beyond.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 237 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 1 <1%
Unknown 236 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 37 16%
Researcher 37 16%
Student > Master 30 13%
Student > Bachelor 20 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 16 7%
Other 29 12%
Unknown 68 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 119 50%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 14 6%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 11 5%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 2%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 2%
Other 13 5%
Unknown 72 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 April 2018.
All research outputs
#18,429,163
of 22,830,751 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Genetics
#7,049
of 11,822 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#203,622
of 283,131 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Genetics
#55
of 66 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,830,751 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,822 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 283,131 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 66 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.