↓ Skip to main content

Prospects and challenges for the conservation of farm animal genomic resources, 2015-2025

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Genetics, October 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (77th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
6 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
62 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
202 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Prospects and challenges for the conservation of farm animal genomic resources, 2015-2025
Published in
Frontiers in Genetics, October 2015
DOI 10.3389/fgene.2015.00314
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michael W. Bruford, Catarina Ginja, Irene Hoffmann, Stéphane Joost, Pablo Orozco-terWengel, Florian J. Alberto, Andreia J. Amaral, Mario Barbato, Filippo Biscarini, Licia Colli, Mafalda Costa, Ino Curik, Solange Duruz, Maja Ferenčaković, Daniel Fischer, Robert Fitak, Linn F. Groeneveld, Stephen J. G. Hall, Olivier Hanotte, Faiz-ul Hassan, Philippe Helsen, Laura Iacolina, Juha Kantanen, Kevin Leempoel, Johannes A. Lenstra, Paolo Ajmone-Marsan, Charles Masembe, Hendrik-Jan Megens, Mara Miele, Markus Neuditschko, Ezequiel L. Nicolazzi, François Pompanon, Jutta Roosen, Natalia Sevane, Anamarija Smetko, Anamaria Štambuk, Ian Streeter, Sylvie Stucki, China Supakorn, Luis Telo Da Gama, Michèle Tixier-Boichard, Daniel Wegmann, Xiangjiang Zhan

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 202 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 1 <1%
Unknown 201 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 50 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 26 13%
Student > Master 26 13%
Student > Bachelor 12 6%
Professor 10 5%
Other 40 20%
Unknown 38 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 95 47%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 20 10%
Environmental Science 9 4%
Social Sciences 8 4%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 6 3%
Other 16 8%
Unknown 48 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2023.
All research outputs
#4,722,336
of 23,462,326 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Genetics
#1,451
of 12,495 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#62,846
of 284,747 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Genetics
#8
of 66 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,462,326 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,495 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 284,747 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 66 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.