↓ Skip to main content

Modifiers and Readers of DNA Modifications and Their Impact on Genome Structure, Expression, and Stability in Disease

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Genetics, June 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Readers on

mendeley
85 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Modifiers and Readers of DNA Modifications and Their Impact on Genome Structure, Expression, and Stability in Disease
Published in
Frontiers in Genetics, June 2016
DOI 10.3389/fgene.2016.00115
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anne K. Ludwig, Peng Zhang, M. C. Cardoso

Abstract

Cytosine base modifications in mammals underwent a recent expansion with the addition of several naturally occurring further modifications of methylcytosine in the last years. This expansion was accompanied by the identification of the respective enzymes and proteins reading and translating the different modifications into chromatin higher order organization as well as genome activity and stability, leading to the hypothesis of a cytosine code. Here, we summarize the current state-of-the-art on DNA modifications, the enzyme families setting the cytosine modifications and the protein families reading and translating the different modifications with emphasis on the mouse protein homologs. Throughout this review, we focus on functional and mechanistic studies performed on mammalian cells, corresponding mouse models and associated human diseases.

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 85 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 85 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 25%
Student > Master 14 16%
Researcher 13 15%
Student > Bachelor 9 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 6%
Other 9 11%
Unknown 14 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 29 34%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 27 32%
Chemistry 6 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 2%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 1%
Other 5 6%
Unknown 15 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 July 2016.
All research outputs
#16,803,918
of 24,716,872 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Genetics
#6,012
of 13,315 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#231,622
of 360,492 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Genetics
#37
of 58 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,716,872 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,315 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 360,492 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 58 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.