↓ Skip to main content

Identification of Single Nucleotide Non-coding Driver Mutations in Cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Genetics, February 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (52nd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
21 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
102 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Identification of Single Nucleotide Non-coding Driver Mutations in Cancer
Published in
Frontiers in Genetics, February 2018
DOI 10.3389/fgene.2018.00016
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kok A. Gan, Sebastian Carrasco Pro, Jared A. Sewell, Juan I. Fuxman Bass

Abstract

Recent whole-genome sequencing studies have identified millions of somatic variants present in tumor samples. Most of these variants reside in non-coding regions of the genome potentially affecting transcriptional and post-transcriptional gene regulation. Although a few hallmark examples of driver mutations in non-coding regions have been reported, the functional role of the vast majority of somatic non-coding variants remains to be determined. This is because the few driver variants in each sample must be distinguished from the thousands of passenger variants and because the logic of regulatory element function has not yet been fully elucidated. Thus, variants prioritized based on mutational burden and location within regulatory elements need to be validated experimentally. This is generally achieved by combining assays that measure physical binding, such as chromatin immunoprecipitation, with those that determine regulatory activity, such as luciferase reporter assays. Here, we present an overview ofin silicoapproaches used to prioritize somatic non-coding variants and the experimental methods used for functional validation and characterization.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 102 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 102 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 19%
Researcher 13 13%
Student > Master 13 13%
Student > Bachelor 10 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 5%
Other 19 19%
Unknown 23 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 46 45%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 19 19%
Computer Science 4 4%
Unspecified 2 2%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 2%
Other 5 5%
Unknown 24 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 March 2018.
All research outputs
#13,063,787
of 23,020,670 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Genetics
#2,784
of 12,073 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#206,650
of 439,370 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Genetics
#38
of 104 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,020,670 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,073 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 439,370 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 104 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.