↓ Skip to main content

The Druggable Pocketome of Corynebacterium diphtheriae: A New Approach for in silico Putative Druggable Targets

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Genetics, February 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
38 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The Druggable Pocketome of Corynebacterium diphtheriae: A New Approach for in silico Putative Druggable Targets
Published in
Frontiers in Genetics, February 2018
DOI 10.3389/fgene.2018.00044
Pubmed ID
Authors

Syed S. Hassan, Syed B. Jamal, Leandro G. Radusky, Sandeep Tiwari, Asad Ullah, Javed Ali, Behramand, Paulo V. S. D. de Carvalho, Rida Shams, Sabir Khan, Henrique C. P. Figueiredo, Debmalya Barh, Preetam Ghosh, Artur Silva, Jan Baumbach, Richard Röttger, Adrián G. Turjanski, Vasco A. C. Azevedo

Abstract

Diphtheria is an acute and highly infectious disease, previously regarded as endemic in nature but vaccine-preventable, is caused byCorynebacterium diphtheriae(Cd). In this work, we used anin silicoapproach along the 13 complete genome sequences ofC. diphtheriaefollowed by a computational assessment of structural information of the binding sites to characterize the "pocketome druggability." To this end, we first computed the "modelome" (3D structures of a complete genome) of a randomly selected reference strain Cd NCTC13129; that had 13,763 open reading frames (ORFs) and resulted in 1,253 (∼9%) structure models. The amino acid sequences of these modeled structures were compared with the remaining 12 genomes and consequently, 438 conserved protein sequences were obtained. The RCSB-PDB database was consulted to check the template structures for these conserved proteins and as a result, 401 adequate 3D models were obtained. We subsequently predicted the protein pockets for the obtained set of models and kept only the conserved pockets that had highly druggable (HD) values (137 across all strains). Later, an off-target host homology analyses was performed considering the human proteome using NCBI database. Furthermore, the gene essentiality analysis was carried out that gave a final set of 10-conserved targets possessing highly druggable protein pockets. To check the target identification robustness of the pipeline used in this work, we crosschecked the final target list with another in-house target identification approach forC. diphtheriaethereby obtaining three common targets, these were; hisE-phosphoribosyl-ATP pyrophosphatase, glpX-fructose 1,6-bisphosphatase II, and rpsH-30S ribosomal protein S8. Our predicted results suggest that thein silicoapproach used could potentially aid in experimental polypharmacological target determination inC. diphtheriaeand other pathogens, thereby, might complement the existing and new drug-discovery pipelines.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 38 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 38 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 8 21%
Student > Master 7 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 8%
Researcher 2 5%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 5%
Other 5 13%
Unknown 11 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 24%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 16%
Chemistry 3 8%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 5%
Engineering 2 5%
Other 4 11%
Unknown 12 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 February 2018.
All research outputs
#18,587,406
of 23,023,224 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Genetics
#7,159
of 12,073 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#334,984
of 446,078 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Genetics
#89
of 113 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,023,224 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,073 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 446,078 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 113 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.